1. ”why
are some clouds dark?” – Karen
Cloud particles are
excellent and very efficient scatterers of sunlight; only
the condensation nuclei in the center (if dark) will
absorb light. A solar photon will experience many
scattering events while traversing a cloud. (The distance
between scattering events in a cloud is approximately 3
meters.) The scattering, which is by
the Mie process, is predominately in the forward
direction and retains its original color, but with the
frequent scattering events the final direction becomes
somewhat random. Cloud tops and illuminated sides are
white (Sun color) because what we see is being scattered
by cloud particles near the edge. Small clouds also have
white to light gray bases because the exiting photons have
experienced limited scattering. For tall or thick clouds
the photons exiting the base are small in number (dark)
because most of the Solar photons have been scattered
outward higher in the cloud.
2. Hailstones – Tracing Their Development
Arthur and family
members experienced a severe hailstorm while on a Texas
Archeological Society Field School in the Texas Panhandle
this past June. This storm produced softball size hail;
Arthur collected some of the hailstones and has produced a
short slide lecture on the development of baseball size
hailstones. To view a PDF version of the lecture which
includes photographs of hailstones and their structure, go
to Arthur Few’s Web
Site where you can download the PDF file.
3. Noctilucent clouds seen in
Nebraska. – Ken
This summer
there have been documented sightings of noctilucent
clouds as far south as Montana(2), Wyoming(1), and
Nebraska(1?); the usual region for seeing them is
northward into Canada.
NASA photo of
a Noctilucent Cloud.
Credit:
NASA/Dave Hughes, 7/2/2011, Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Noctilucent clouds
are very special for a number of reasons:
1. They are very
high, between 75 and 85 kilometers, in the upper
mesosphere just below the region of the aurora and the
ionosphere. See figure below.
2. They form in
a region where there should, by ordinary processes, be
no water; yet they are composed of ice.
3. They may be a
recent phenomenon; there are no reports of sightings
prior to 1885, and there is an indication that they are
increasing in frequency.
4. They are only
visible at night and when the Sun is 6 to 16 degrees
below the horizon so that the cloud is still
illuminated.
5. They only appear
in the summer, and usually between 50º and 70º
latitude.
So, how do they
exist?
1. It is
very unlikely that water from the lower atmosphere can
reach the altitude of noctilucent clouds because of (1)
the cold trap at the top of the troposphere where the
temperature is around -60º C and (2) the lack of
convection in the lower stratosphere. [ At -60ºC
& 200hP only 1 in 10,000 molecules can be water;
whereas, at mean surface conditions 1 in 100 can be
water molecules. One might say that a function of clouds
is to prevent water from reaching the upper atmosphere.
Without convection in the lower stratosphere there is no
dynamic vertical motion to transport water upward.]
2. Several
possible sources of the water are (1) micrometeoroids
which bring water and dust into the upper atmosphere,
(2) chemical reactions of methane with ions in the upper
atmosphere producing water, and (3) space-bound rockets
using hydrogen and oxygen fuels whose product is water.
[Micrometeoroids burn up upon entering the upper
atmosphere and do produce water and dust needed to form
the clouds. But, why no noctilucent clouds seen before
1885? The methane source can add additional water and
would be consistent with the human-produced increase in
methane and increasing frequency of noctilucent cloud
sightings. There have been confirmed instances of small
noctilucent clouds associated with space launches;
however, the rockets spend so little time passing
through the upper mesosphere that they could not by
themselves account for the needed quantity of water.]
3. Extremely
cold temperatures are required to produce ice clouds
with the scarce water available at these altitudes. [The
absolute coldest region of the atmosphere (-100ºC)
is in the high latitude mesosphere in the summer. One
would expect that noctilucent clouds would be visible
throughout this region, but inside the arctic circle the
Sun never sets so there is no darkness. The usual
observable latitudes are from 50º to 70º.
ref.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctilucent_cloud
The Earth's
Atmospheric Structure
Graphic above from
Meteorology Today
by Ahrens
4. Explain the Moon’s Major and
Minor Standstills. – Karen
The Moon’s orbit is
inclined ~5.1º to the ecliptic (the plane containing
the Earth’s orbit). The Earth’s rotational axis has a
angle of 23.5º to the ecliptic. Owing to
gravitational influences the Moon’s orbital tilt axis
rotates with respect to the Earth’s spin axis with a
period of 18.6 years. When aligned parallel the two axes
add to produce a Moon declination of 28.6º; this is
the Major Standstill. 9.3 years later (half of 18.6 years)
the Moon’s orbital axis is anti-parallel to the Earth’s
spin axis, and the Moon’s declination is 18.4º; this
is the Minor Standstill. The last Major Standstill was
centered on 2006 and the next will be centered on 2025.
The next Minor Standstill will be centered on 2015. The
period is long, and I use the term “centered on” because
the standstills do not change much in a couple of
years and vary with the observer’s latitude. To view a
slide lecture (PDF) on the Standstills, which includes a
photograph of a Moon set in Gold Hill near the last Major
Standstill, go to Arthur Few’s Web
Site where you can download the PDF file.
5. Spectacular lightning photo from
Gold Hill. – Gary Siemer
The photograph above was taken by Gary Siemer around
10P on Thursday August 6, 2009, from in front of the Gold
Hill Inn. This is a time exposure (~30 s) using a tripod. In
the photo we see five lightning flashes all from the same
thundercloud and occurring within the 30 second exposure.
Photograph used with the permission of Gary Siemer.
Take note of the bright spot on the cloud base where the
flash exits the cloud.
Flash 1. This is the brightest of the flashes and probably
the first. In technical terms this is a negative,
multi-stroke, forked, cloud-to-ground flash; it is fairly
common. Negative means that negative charge is transported
to the ground. Multi-stroke means there is more than one
current surge from the ground. Forked means that at least
two of the branches contact ground; some of the dimmer
branches may or may not have made ground contact.
Flash 2. The channel of this flash passes in front of the
bright exit of Flash 1 making it difficult to trace the
channel, but it appears that the channel branches in this
region with one branch going to the right and the other
proceeding in the original direction. The channel to the
right branches again with the upper branch going toward the
cloud base. The lower two branches terminate in the air.
Flash 3. Is highly tortuous as it proceeds downward at ~
45º angle. About half way to the ground it branches;
the lower branch executes an exotic dance, going first down
then back up appearing to wrap around itself. (We are
viewing a two dimensional projection of a three dimensional
channel.) The upper branch of channel #3 proceeds
upward passing in front of (?) channel #4 and into the cloud
base.Technically this is an Intra-cloud discharge. There is
a positive charge on the base of the cloud called a
screening layer.
Flash 4. This flash is called an air discharge for obvious
reasons; it does not terminate.
Flash 5. This is a winner and somewhat unusual. It is an
upward discharge; we know this from the way that channel
branches upward and into the cloud base. It probably
originated from a distant mountain peak or power-line tower.
Tall structures (e.g. the Empire State Building) frequently
eject these upward flashes. This flash was probably
triggered by the large electric field surge from nearby
Flash 1 and occurred immediately following #1.
6. What makes tsunamis so different
and destructive?
A tsunami is a special type of gravity wave. Gravity waves
can occur in any fluid in which density decreases with
height. In the atmosphere density decreases with altitude;
thus we have atmospheric gravity waves in the stable layers
of the atmosphere. Oceans have constant density; however, at
the surface (ocean – air interface) the density decreases by
approximately a factor of 1000. This provides an excellent
condition for gravity waves. All ocean surface waves are
gravity waves. The wavelength of an ocean surface wave is
the length between adjacent wave peaks. When the water depth
is greater than the wavelength the waves are ordinary or
deep-water waves; when the water depth is smaller than the
wave length then they are shallow-water waves, and you can
get tsunamis. The average depth of the oceans is 3.8 km;
thus the wavelength of an ocean tsunami is many km. Over the
open ocean the height of a tsunami will be less than 1 m
making them difficult to detect. An important property of
tsunamis is that the deeper the water the faster they
travel. As the tsunami approaches land the leading part of
the wave slows down while the following part catches up
forming a very large and destructive flooding wave.
To view a PDF version of a lecture on tsunamis, go to Arthur
Few’s Web Site where you can download the PDF file.
7. Observations of Equinox sunrises on
the Gold Hill Town Meadow?
Photos by Arthur Few taken
from the Gold Hill Town Meadow.
There are two photos above; the lower photo is of
equinox sunrise on 9/22/08 at 7:28, and the Sun is rising
directly behind the equinox pole. Clouds obscured the
sunrise September 22 and 23, 2009, so no photos were
obtained of the sunrise. However, broken clouds on
9/24/09, equinox + 2 days, allowed sunrise photos between
gaps in the clouds. The upper photo was taken 9/24/09 at
7:36; the sunrise this day was at 7:34, but the Sun was
behind a cloud at that time. Had our sunrise photo 2009
been taken on the Equinox, the Sun would have been behind
the pole as it was in 2008; note how far to the south the
sunrise has shifted in two days. Computations show that in
two days, the time of sunrise is delayed by two minutes,
and the angle to the sunrise position shifts 1º
southward.
8. Is there a special “Blue Moon” on
New Year’s Eve?
On New Year’s eve, 2009, we will have a Blue Moon. The
astronomical Blue Moon has been defined in various ways over
time, but mostly (since 1946) it relates to the
occurrence of a second full moon in a calendar month. The
last time that we had a Blue Moon on December 31 was in
1990, and the next time will be 2028. Months with 31 days
are more likely to have a Blue Moon, and poor February can
never have a Blue Moon.
The time between full Moons is 29.53 days. The mean year
(including the leap-year effect) is 365.25 days. Thus the
number of full Moons per mean year is 12.37. So, each mean
year we have 12 full Moons, and we gain an extra 0.37 full
Moons left over per year. The inverse of 0.37 is 2.7 or
roughly 3 years. Approximately every 3 years we will have 13
full Moons, so in one of the 12 months (except February) we
will have two full Moons and the second one is called a Blue
Moon.
A previous method of defining a Blue Moon employed a
solar-based calendar. The first day of the year was winter
solstice and there were four quarters: Winter solstice
to spring equinox, spring equinox to summer
solstice, summer solstice to fall equinox,
and fall equinox to winter solstice. In a normal year
each quarter had three full Moons, but on the approximate
3-year cycle one of the quarters would have four full Moons.
The Blue Moon was designated as the third full Moon in the
quarter having four full Moons. Why the third? The church,
using the ecclesiastical calendar determines the date of
Lent and Easter using full moons; the Lenten Moon is the
last full Moon of winter, and the Easter Moon is the first
full Moon of spring. Easter is then the Sunday following the
Easter Moon, and Lent starts on Ash Wednesday 46 days before
Easter. The Lenten Moon occurs during this 46 day
period. Since the dates of Lent and Easter are
determined by full Moons and the equinox, having a fourth
full Moon in the winter quarter would have to be the Lenten
Moon, hence the Blue Moon would need to be the third. If the
extra full Moon was the third then the ecclesiastical
calendar would remain in the designated bounds. It is
unclear when or why the term blue became attache to the
third full moon in a quarter. Thankfully this usage has been
trashed in favor of the second full moon in a calendar
month.
See the photo below. As the Blue Moon was setting in the
west on January 1, 2010, the Sun was rising in the east; in
the photo the tops of the trees in the west are just being
illuminated by the rising sun.
My thanks are extended to daughter Alice Few (web site)
for providing Blue Moon websites (NASA, Sky
and Telescope)
On December 31, 2009, we had a rather rare event; a Blue
Moon occurring on New Year’s Eve. A Blue Moon is a second
full Moon in a calendar month. This event will occur on New
Year’s Eve only every 19 years; if you’re lucky and healthy
you can experience this event again in 2028.
This photo was taken from our Gold Hill home as our Gold
Hill Blue Moon was setting on 1/1/10 at 7:23 MST.
9. Why does the ash plume coming from
the Icelandic volcano sometimes create lightning? – Ken
Fernalld
Arthur’s response to the volcano lightning question
has been moved to his web page. You can download the PDF
response with the photographs at: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~few/
10. Which day is
the fall equinox, the 22nd or the 23rd? The TV news and
the newspaper disagree. – Cherry
Equinox
From an Earth-based perspective fall equinox
corresponds to the passage of the Sun from the northern to
the southern hemisphere. There are a couple of ways of
visualizing this process. The subsolar point on the Earth’s
surface is the point directly below the Sun. At that point
the Sun would be directly overhead, at your zenith. At that
moment no other place on Earth would see the Sun directly
overhead. Subsolar points exist only in the tropics, between
23.5º north and 23.5º south. At the fall equinox
the Sun’s subsolar point crosses the equator from north to
south. We can also consider the Sun at local noon; at the
equator on the fall equinox the noon sun moves from north to
south. However, if you live at 40º north latitude, as
we do, the noon Sun is never north of overhead. It moves
from a little south to way south. Only if you are
equator-ward of 23.5º (the tropics) will the noon Sun
ever appear north of overhead. The sunrises and sunsets are
more complicated and much more interesting for those of us
not living in the tropics. The simplified version of this is
that in northern hemisphere summer the sunrise and sunset
points along the horizon are north of due east and due west;
in winter the sunrise and sunset points are south of due
east and due west. This movement of the sunrise and sunset
positions is something that we (and all human cultures in
the past) can easily observe. Stonehenge is a good example,
and it is only one of many similar observatories.
The astronomical definition of equinox employs the ecliptic
coordinate system defined by the Earth’s orbit about the
Sun. In this system the Earth’s spin axis is directed
23.5º with respect to the ecliptic plane, but the
direction of the spin axis is always pointed to a fixed
direction in space near the North Star. As the Earth rotates
around the Sun the relationship between the direction from
the Sun to Earth and the Earth’s spin axes changes
from -23.5º to +23.5º; the equinoxes (fall
and spring) are defined as the moments in time when this
angle passes through 0º. Equinoxes are moments in time
not a designated day.
The common definition that day and night are equal on the
equinox is not exactly true; the equal day and night date
depends upon the time of the equinox and your latitude and
longitude. This year, 2010, the fall equinox occurred at
3:09 UT on September 23; this corresponds to 9:09 p.m. MST
on September 22. To illustrate that the length of
night and day are not necessarily equal on the equinox we
can calculate the length of the day (sunrise to sunset) in
Gold Hill (latitude 40.06º, longitude 105.41º). On
September 22 it is 12 hours and 10 minutes; on September 23
it is 12 hours and 7 minutes. The date that is closest to
the equinox having equal day and night is September 26; on
which the day is 11 hours and 59 minutes, one minute off
equal day and night.
In Gold Hill we have traditionally celebrated equinox
sunrise as opposed to sunset. The main reason being our
topography lends itself best to observing sunrises. Which
date, September 22 or 23, is most appropriate? Sunrise on
the 22nd occurred 14 hours and 20 minutes from the equinox
at 9:09 p.m.; whereas, on the 23rd it was 9 hours and 41
minutes. Sunrise on the 23rd is closer to the equinox than
sunrise on the 22nd. That said; I made equinox observations
on both dates as well a several days bracketing the equinox.
All photos by Arthur
Few in Gold Hill, CO.
11. Fall equinox, Part 2,
Special Days. Arthur
Special Days
Equinox 2010
Part 2
Some special days are special because of connections with
the past such a birthdays, anniversaries, national holidays,
etc. Other special days are special in their own right just
because of the confluence of events of the day. The
two fall equinox days of 2010, September 22 and 23, that
were the subject of my previous “Ask Arthur” response on
“Equinox” (Part 1) are special days of this second kind.
On the evening of September 23, the Gold Hill Inn
reopened following the evacuations and the 4-Mile Canyon
Fire. We joined the packed house and had dinner. Gold Hill
was slowly returning to some semblance of normalcy.
During the entire month of September Gold Hill received
0.06” of measurable precipitation. This rainfall occurred on
September 22.
Photos by Arthur Few
in Gold Hill, CO.
Some days are
intrinsically special
12. The Belt of Venus. Arthur
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Notes and
Comments
1. There is another feature of the Belt of Venus that
we can see in the previous photograph. If you trace
the Belt of Venus starting at the anti-sunward
point and move to the left you see that it
curves along the top of the Earth’s shadow; then when
the shadow stops, the Belt of Venus continues along
the horizon until the forward scattered sunlight
washes it out. The same thing happens tracing to the
right. So, although the Earth’s Shadow is limited to
the anti-sunward sector, The Belt of Venus extends
almost 360º.
2. How did the Belt of Venus get its name? The usual
first guess is that Venus is the morning star and the
evening star and it never appears too far above the
horizon; in this, it is like the Belt of Venus. Good
guess but probably not correct. When Venus is the
morning star it rises ahead of the Sun, and when it is
the evening star it follows the Sun down. Venus is
always in the sunward side of the sky and appears near
the Sun; it is never in the Belt of Venus. Venus was
the Roman goddess who was the equivalent to the Greek
goddess Aphrodite. Apparently, Aphrodite had a wide
belt of gold given to her by her husband; someone has
suggested that Aphrodite’s belt became the “Belt of
Venus.” What do you think?
3. Observing the Belt of Venus in Gold Hill. Owing to
our topography (Horsfal ridge to the east), we do not
have a “distant horizon” to the east, but we have a
magnificent distant horizon to the west, the mountains
along the continental divide. A good place from which
to observe the sunrise Belt of Venus is the Gold Hill
marker. Furthermore, we have splendid atmospheric
conditions (dry, clear, clean) much of the year
especially in the fall. Could one see the sunset Belt
of Venus from Horsfal or Big Horn or selected places
along Sunshine Canyon Drive where there is a distant
horizon to the east? Possibly on a very good day, but
the horizon to the east includes Denver, Boulder, etc.
with their afternoon haze and pollution, which would
obscure the phenomenon.
13. Is
there a total lunar eclipse this December? Karen
Photos of the Lunar Eclipse in Gold Hill by Arthur
Few
14. Look! What are those
sparkly things? Joan
Diamond
Dust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
“Diamond dust is a ground-level cloud composed of
tiny ice crystals. … Diamond dust generally
forms under otherwise clear or nearly clear skies,
so it is sometimes referred to as clear-sky
precipitation. It is most commonly observed in
Antarctica and the Arctic, but it can occur anywhere
with a temperature well below freezing. In Polar
regions diamond dust may continue for several days
without interruption.” … “The depth of the diamond
dust layer can vary substantially from as little as
20 to 30 m (66 to 98 ft) to 300 meters (980
ft). Because diamond dust does not always reduce
visibility it is often first noticed by the brief
flashes caused when the tiny crystals, tumbling
through the air, reflect sunlight to your eye. This
glittering effect gives the phenomenon its name
since it looks like many tiny diamonds are flashing
in the air.”
Here in Gold Hill, on Tuesday, February 2, 2011, our
temperature was -16ºF at 6:30 a.m.; by 7:45
a.m. it was -22ºF. The following morning at
5:30 a.m. it was -21ºF and stayed there most of
the day. We had a period of roughly a day and a half
in which the temperature was below -20ºF, the
sky was clear, and the sun was shining – ideal
conditions for Diamond Dust.
On the Tuesday afternoon I observed tiny ice
crystals falling slowly and moving with the very
slight breeze. I observed this through a north
facing window in the shadow of the house; they were
so small you had to look for them; otherwise they
would not have been noticed. On Wednesday afternoon
Joan called my attention to “sparkling snow” outside
the office window. I saw them; this time through a
south facing window in the sunshine. They were
sparkling; I knew that we had Diamond Dust. I had
frequently seen them at the South Pole, Antarctica,
but I had not expected to see them in Gold Hill.
The graphic above is the Morphology Diagram
for snowflakes and ice crystals from Ken Libbrecht’s
Field Guide to Snowflakes. The horizontal axis
displays the temperature in both units of degrees
Celsius and Fahrenheit; note that the entire
temperature range shown is below freezing. The
vertical axis is supersaturation with respect to
ice; if you think of the origin at zero on the
vertical axis as 100% relative humidity then
humidity increases above 100% upward on the diagram
(100.1%, etc.). One might think that having relative
humidity greater than 100% doesn’t make sense. This
happens because it is physically difficult to create
a minuscule cloud droplet or ice crystal without the
assistance of even smaller “nuclei”, which are
extremely small solid particles in the atmosphere;
these nuclei form the core of the droplet or
crystal, and supersaturation is required to start
the growth process.
{Aside: The curved line identified as “Water
saturation” is the 100% relativity humidity curve
with respect to water. Saturation for water and ice
are different; one is a liquid and the other a
crystal. In the region below the curve, water vapor
is supersaturated with respect to ice but
unsaturated with respect to water; hence water vapor
will preferentially condense on the ice. Even above
the water curve supersaturation for ice is greater
than supersaturation for water. When water and ice
coexist in a cloud, water vapor will always favor
the ice even to the extent that the ice will “steal”
water molecules from the water droplets.}
Now examine the far right region of the diagram
where the temperature is below -20ºF. In
this region, which was the condition we experienced
here in Gold Hill on February 2 & 3, 2011, only
ice crystals exist. (It was too cold to snow, but
that’s another story.) It is the small, solid,
simple plates occupying the lower position on the
diagram that predominate in this region. Higher
humidities are required to produce the more
elaborate plates and columns. These simple ice
crystal plates are Diamond Dust. In the center and
left regions of the diagram, the warmer and
more moist regions, we see the development of
snowflakes.
Diamond Dust plates are extremely small; the ones in
the photographs below are about 0.1 mm (100 microns)
across. They would be difficult to see and nearly
impossible to photograph were it not for their
ability to reflect sunlight. When oriented exactly
such that sunlight is reflected from the surface of
the plate into the eye or the camera a flash of
light is observed. In a situation where many
crystals are moving in the air that they occupy;
they sparkle. It is somewhat like a swarm of
fireflies except much brighter.
In the photograph above I have placed white
circles over bright small spots that are probable
Diamond Dust reflections. In making these selections
I looked for symmetric bright spots with a uniform
dark background. Undoubtedly, there are many more in
this photograph that are not circled. For example
there are short bright streaks that may be Diamond
Dust moving during the exposure. I am sure that you
can find many more examples than I have circled.
Directly below the Sun near the bottom, the circled
bright spot has a red tent; this is probably the
interference effect of a double reflection from the
top and bottom of the plate. Without knowledge
of Diamond Dust would you have ever noticed anything
special about this photograph?
The photograph above is of the Diamond Dust
accumulation on the railing of our balcony. The
individual ruler marks are spaced 1 mm apart, and
the bright Diamond Dust reflections appear to be 0.1
mm across or 100 microns. Looking closely you will
also see red and green tinted reflections produced
by interference between reflections on the upper and
lower sides of the thin plates.
The next time we have: (1) really cold weather, (2)
an absence of clouds overhead, (3) sunshine, (4)
clean unpolluted air, and (5) what appears to be a
thin fog close to the surface; look in the direction
toward the Sun but below the Sun and expect to be
entertained by Diamond Dust.
15a. I’m not sure why they
call this a gravity wave,… Ken
15b. So here’s a guy talking about gravity
waves at the sea surface. Are they the same … in the
atmosphere? Karen
Gravity
Waves and Wave Clouds
They are called gravity waves because gravity
is the restoring force for the displaced air/water
parcel. The fundamental physical process is the same
for water waves and atmospheric waves. In the case
of water waves the surface is elevated above the
mean height (wave crest) and gravity pulls it back
down, but it overshoots and descends below the mean
surface (wave trough).
For atmospheric gravity waves we need to distinguish
between the states of “stability” and “instability.”
A stable atmosphere does not support vertical
motions but suppresses them – there are no updrafts
no clouds; whereas, the unstable atmosphere will
amplify small vertical motions producing updrafts
and downdrafts.
A stable atmosphere is a prerequisite for the
formation of atmospheric gravity waves. In a stable
atmosphere a parcel of air that is vertically
displaced upward from its level finds its density
greater than the surrounding air and gravity pulls
it back down; it can overshoot and be less dense
than the surrounding air and gravity forces it back
up. As with the water gravity wave, an atmospheric
gravity wave is formed. In most cases we cannot see
the atmospheric gravity wave. If, however, the wave
occurs in a layer of air nearly saturated with water
vapor then it can produce “wave clouds.” See the
satellite image below from NASA's Earth Observatory.
The cloud part is produced by the crest where the
air parcel moves upward and is cooled; the
transparent part is the trough where the air parcel
is moved downward and is warmed.
In an unstable atmosphere an air parcel displaced
upward is in an environment of greater density and
thus experiences an upward force of gravity. If
displaced downward it is more dense than the
surrounding air and experiences a downward
gravitational force. Thus any displacement of an
atmospheric parcel produces an amplified effect –
convection, clouds, etc.
In the satellite image below, we can see both
conditions. The satellite is over the Indian Ocean;
in the upper part we see tops of convective clouds
and in the middle section we see atmospheric gravity
waves. Most probably the convective clouds are over
land or warm surface water where the surface heating
promotes instability. Over the ocean the air is
cooler and stable. As the wind flowing left to right
passes over a small volcanic island gravity waves
are generated, which downwind become wave clouds and
visible for very long distances downwind of the
island. Note that at the overlapping margins of the
two types of clouds the lower atmosphere is unstable
producing convective clouds and above that a stable
region exhibits wave clouds.
Gravity waves are interesting wherever they
occur, whether we can see them or not. See also the
“Ask Arthur” discussion of tsunamis – the ultimate
expression of gravity waves.
————————————–
Hard to believe, but when I completed the comments
above Joan and I walked down to the mailbox and on
the way we saw the most fantastic display of high
altitude wave clouds. By the time I got home a got
my camera they had significantly changed but there
remained a good display, which I photographed at
3:51 p.m. See below. There was a telephone message
from Ken telling me to go outside and look at the
clouds.
The wave clouds that we saw ~ 30 minutes earlier
were bright white and covered whole visible sky
above us; mixed in with the wave clouds were some
very small cumulus structures. The wave features
were much smaller than the ones in these photos.
Karen observed them down in Boulder, and I suspect
that they could have been seen over our local part
of the Front Range. If you are reading this and know
someone that has a photograph of the earlier wave
clouds, please ask them to send me a copy
<few@rice.edu>.
Compare these photographs with the NASA image
near the beginning of the response.
More on
the wave-cloud event of 3/23/11
Meteorological balloons (radiosondes) are
launched by the NWS in Denver at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m.
MDT daily to obtain upper air data. The wave-cloud
event (3/23/11) here in Gold Hill was essentially
over by 4 p.m., so the 6 p.m. radiosonde is the
closest sounding to our event.
The diagram below is called a “Skew T - ln
p” chart; this chart is a useful and powerful tool
in understanding details of atmospheric structure,
but a complete understanding is beyond the scope
of what we need to analyze the wave cloud event.
First, the “ln p” refers to the vertical axis on
the left. The numbers (900 - 100) are the
pressures in hectopascals (= millibars) at the
atmospheric levels indicated by the horizontal
blue lines. You will note that the numbers are not
evenly spaced; they are logarithmically spaced. To
the right of the vertical axis are numbers giving
the approximate heights in meters of pressure
levels. Example; in the oval: the 500 hP level is
5620 meters above sea level in the standard (~
average) atmosphere.
Now note that there are no vertical lines
on the chart; they are replaced by straight blue
lines of constant temperature, which are
“skewed” by 45º. Example; the red diagonal
line is the 0º C temperature line.
There are curved lines for: “dry adiabatic
processes” (= curved green), “wet adiabatic
processes, inside clouds” (= curved blue).
There are straight lines = “mixing ratio,
which are the measure of water content” (=
diagonal magenta).
All of the lines described above are part
of the chart format and do not reflect measured
atmospheric properties. There are two heavy black
lines representing the radiosonde-measured values
of temperature (= right line) and the dew point
temperature (= left line). At a given level the
air is dry when these lines are widely separated
and moist when close together.
I have constructed two orange boxes around
the temperature curves. The lower box between 800
hP and ~ 650 hP is dry. Now compare the
temperature line with the nearby green (= dry
adiabatic lines); they are parallel; therefore, in
this region the air is cloud free and in
convective motion. The dew point temperature line
in this region is parallel to the magenta mixing
ratio lines; this is consistent with dry
convective processes.
In the smaller orange rectangle above the
convective region conditions are different. The
temperature line is now parallel to the wet
adiabatic curves (= curved blue lines) and the dew
point curve shows decreasing water vapor with
altitude. Both of these characteristics indicate
convection in clouds, but their separation does
not indicate present saturation of the air. What
we can conclude from this profile is that this
layer of air was previously inside a cloud but has
moved horizontally and dried somewhat. Remarkably,
the temperature profile has “remembered” its past
life in the cloud! This “memory or imprinting”
happens frequently in the atmosphere when the flow
is predominately horizontal. I have seen cases of
dry air layers over the U. S. with wet adiabatic
profiles, and the air layer can be traced back to
tropical storms in the Pacific.
There is a very special “nose shaped”
feature in the maroon circle above the small
orange box. Upon close inspection we see that the
temperature increases with altitude; this is an
inversion layer, and it is super stable. Note that
above this inversion layer the air is extremely
dry; the inversion prevents moisture from below
reaching the air above.